Not Be Violated, Not be Infringed, Make No Rule

Can you imagine if a company contracted you in a job in which the agreement said your services must be paid for and “shall not be violated”? And then an arbitration board that works for the company decides they won’t pay you for some of your work, AND claims with a straight face the contract said it was ok?

Can you imagine if your company contracted a job in which the agreement said your services must be paid for, the right to pay “shall not be infringed”? And then an arbitration board that works for the company decides to infringe that constraint, AND claims with a straight face the contract said it was ok?

Can you imagine if your company contracted a job in which the agreement said the contractor “shall make no rule” governing your wish to pray occassionaly at the job site? And then an arbitration board that works for the hiring company makes a rule you cannot pray, AND claims the contract cleary said it was ok?

That’s our Supreme Court’s behavior.

Political Heroin

The value proposition of socialism is very simple:
You can tell the leftist Democrats and Republicans to end all firearm infringements, stop lying about white policeman, re-start amendment 10, re-start the Bill of Rights, stop the government from intimidating the press, and stop handing out huge sums of money to corporations all you want…..
But unless you offer them more money and preferential, prefixed-rights than the socialist politicians are offering them, they will continue to say what the socialist politicians and press reward them to say.
And the lies will get bigger and bigger – their lies become your laws. And as the populace grows poorer, the socialists’ offer of political heroin looks more and more intoxicating.

They Said There Would Not Be A Trade War

Bull butter.

We are in a trade war, they’re just proclaiming it’s not.

Global trade has now turned into global currency manipulation – a fake, GDP juicing tactic to hype the indicators.    And the secret “free trade” deals amount to war-like deceptions, more non-market based manipulative solutions.

Trade war.

The leftists swore only protectionism would spawn a trade war.  Now we have indirect, non-market based manipulation to gain an upper hand. This is not capitalism, this is competing con men.

But why is it a “true” trade war, you ask?

It is a trade war because the “warring” economies are all printing money to “stimulate” their economies.   However, printing money is a common scheme used against enemies during war:  Counterfeit their money.   So without plainspoken, plausible proof – which does not exist – it cannot possibly be good to print fake money to ruin an enemy, and print fake money at home expecting the opposite result.

If the competing economies are employing fake money, they are either intent on destroying an enemy, or deceptive, short term gain.   Fake money has always crashed every society that tries it. That’s why Keynes said:

“Lenin was right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

Keynes was right, for once.

John D. Lofgren @ Junto
Author of “Atlas Shouts”  the #2 rated money book on Amazon:

Atlas Shouts, The Movie:
Blog radio:

Black Leaders Say Black Lives Matter Is A Lie

Take a look at all these honest black leaders saying Black Lives Matter is a lie-based movement.

Larry Elder

“Demonstrable Lies Fuel Anti-Cop Movement”

Sheriff David Clarke, Milwaukee

“Barack Obama Started This War On Police.  I am too pissed off tonight to be diplomatic with what’s going on and I’m not going to stick my head in the sand about it.”

Sheriff Greg Allen, El Paso

“Black Lives Matter, as far as I am concerned, is a radical hate group.”

Walter Williams

“One of the true tragedies is that black politicians, preachers and civil rights advocates give massive support to criminals such as Brown, Garner and Scott. “

Thomas Sowell

“Chief among those who generate this poisonous atmosphere are career race hustlers like Al Sharpton and racist institutions like the “Black Lives Matter” movement. All such demagogues need is a situation where there has been a confrontation where someone was white and someone else was black. The facts don’t matter to them.”

Alfonzo Rachel

“But BLM are just becoming an intimidation arm of the democrat party the same as the KKK were, and they are sold out for socialism the same as the Nazis.”

Mychal Massie

“Obama foments racial unrest and a racial divide to further his neo-Leninist agenda. Sharpton foments racial unrest for personal gain. The New Black Panther Party foments racial hostilities and the demonization of whites in the foolish belief they can bring about a Western version of apartheid where blacks rule.“

Jonathan Gentry

“all we know how to do is march and loot…….what you NEED to hear instead of what you want to hear…….blame police and white folks…….LETS CHANGE US BLACK PEOPLE…….how our kids supposed to grow up if we out here acting STUPID…….we have toiled the mountain long enough…….civil rights activists came out of nowhere, we gonna want justice”

“shut up”

“black panthers naacp come out the woodwork …. 47 drive by’s in one weekend……. where were YOU…….debunk that myth as far as being young and black and mistreated…….many encounters with the police and I became GOOD FRIENDS with them”



The Great Social Security Rip Off of 1998

Please folks, wake up to the fact Gingrich was a key player in ushering the gov’t into the era of mass fiscal fraud. Both parties faked the American populace into believing the budget was balanced. Bull butter.

“Both Democrats and Republicans are all running this year and next and saying surplus, surplus. Look what we have done. It is false. The actual figures show that from the beginning of the fiscal year until now we had to borrow $127,800,000,000.” – Democratic Senator Ernest Hollings, October 28, 1999 at 5:30

Democrat Leaders Argue Just Like Liberals On Social Media

“An acquaintance from my days in the Clinton administration, who has been advising Hillary, phoned this morning.

ACQUAINTANCE: “Don’t you think your blog post from last night was a bit harsh?”

ME: “Not at all. The Democratic Party is shooting itself in the foot by not officially opposing the Trans Pacific Partnership.”

ACQ: “But you know why. The Party can’t take a stand opposite the President’s. He’s the leader of the Party, for chrissake. And he wants the TPP.”

ME: “Yeah, because he sees the TPP as a way to limit China’s economic influence. So he made a Faustian bargain with big global corporations who want more protection for their foreign investments. But he’s wrong. The TPP won’t crimp China. Global corporations will give China whatever it wants to gain access to the Chinese market. The TPP ….”

ACQ: “Look, it doesn’t matter what you or I think. The President wants the TPP, and the Party isn’t going to oppose him.”

ME: “You mean Hillary won’t oppose him.”

ACQ: “Hillary won’t, and Debbie [Wasserman Schultz] won’t, and neither will Nancy [Pelosi] or Harry [Reid] or Dick [Durbin] or Chuck [Schumer].

ME: “But it’s terrible policy. And it’s awful politics. It gives Trump a battering ram. Obama won’t be president in six months. Why risk it?”

Now here’s how extraordinarily dismissive and contemptuous of the American public Hillary Clinton’s people really are.

ACQ: “They don’t see much of a risk. Most Americans don’t know or care about the TPP.”

ME: “But they know big corporations are running economic policy. They think the whole system is corrupt. Believe me, Trump will use this against Hillary.

ACQ: “He can’t. She’s inoculated. She’s come out against the TPP.”

ME: “But it’s her delegates who voted not to oppose it in the Democratic platform. Her fingerprints are all over this thing.”

ACQ: “I think you’re being too cynical.”

ME: “Actually, the real cynic is you.”

Not Your Father’s Democrat Party: Lynch Mobs Again

Not Your Father’s Democrat Party

This is not your father’s Democrat party, this is Obama’s Democrat Party.  Hillary’s Democratic Party.   Holder’s Democratic Party.

Now they use your tax money–millions of dollars–to pay for “community organizers” to battle crime infested cities so they can “reduce” tensions between racial minorities and police. The result? An alarming increase in residents rioting, looting and burning businesses down.  And now, we’ve got “Lynch” mobs.  Again.  And then the government spends more tax money to fund the “victims” of looting to rebuild the businesses.  It’s the socialists’ idea of a “business cycle”:  Burn. Loot. Rebuild.  Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

Sharpton.  Holder.  Obama. And now Lynch.

Democrats Organizing “Lynch” Mobs – Again

A Truth Machine

To keep each discussion on topic, the moderator should use the following rules:

Only 3 types of posts are allowed in response to any lead post:

  • You can disagree, but only with facts of support, or it may be summarily removed.
  • You can agree
  • You can request more supporting data for a lead post claim.

Participants will be required to answer questions about any “disagreement” or “off topic” claims with frank and gracious dialogue. Often this is needed just for clarity, not for suspicion of false claims or intentions. Evasive replies will be considered evasion of honesty.

Opinion and contradiction are hereby contraband, subject to summary removal.

  • Rule of Apology

If false claims, opinion, or contradiction are exposed, the contributor will be required to apologize before further posting is allowed. This keeps people humble, and usually the disruptor quits at this point.

  • Suggest a New Thread

When someone is passionate about what is considered an off-topic post, I sometimes offer them to start a new thread. “If it’s so important start a new thread.” They rarely do, which exposes the tactics was meant for disruption, not clarity.

  • Source of Rules

The rules above were derived from Ben Franklin’s Junto Club rule:

“Our debates were to be under the direction of a president, and to be conducted in the sincere spirit of inquiry after truth, without fondness for dispute or desire of victory; and to prevent warmth, all expressions of positiveness in opinions, or direct contradiction, were after some time made contraband, and prohibited under small pecuniary penalties.”

Obama Reverses The South Carolina Racism Claim

Obama lied again?    Yep.  A whopper.  He contradicts his claim about the white South Carolina shooter today – to make the Dallas black guy look disconnected from white-hating racism.

Today’s Lie

First he says the Dallas shooter was not representative of the whole, just like the South Carolina shooter was not:

“Obama said the Dallas shooter, an Army veteran who was later killed by police, was a “demented individual” who does not represent black Americans, any more than a white man accused of killing blacks at a church in Charleston, South Carolina, represents whites.”

The Prior Lie

But in his speech after the SC shooting he DOES say it is troubling sign of racism!!!  He says the South Carolina shooter was affected by the white racism of the general population:

“The fact that this took place in a black church obviously also raises questions about a dark part of our history. This is not the first time that black churches have been attacked. And we know that hatred across races and faiths pose a particular threat to our democracy and our ideals.”

When Did The Truth Became Offensive?

I recall these coincidental changes in public discussion of truth:

  • In 2009 after Obama’s election, I noticed the mainstream media news suddenly began going dark on information that matters.
  • At the same time, I started posting important news items of Facebook – news that mattered.
  • My focus on factual news reporting and debate became offensive to all my liberal friends, while most conservatives tuned in more.
  • My liberal friends began abandoning me, and reversed their prior 8 years behavior:  They changed from insisting on talking very angry, falsely founded “politics” while “W” was president – into demanding all “political” discussion – talk they didn’t agree with, of course – must be stopped.
  • Now religion and politics are off limits in social situations with liberals.
  • I began seeing blacks say I could not argue for “black” policies because I was not black, most – not all – black leaders became openly and doubly racist, as did their leaders. A white man was incabable of understanding them or being their ally, in their racist view.
  • In 2013, I predicted a new Jim Crow era – for Christians – in the synopsis for “Atlas Shouts”.
  • In 2016, Sheriff David Clarke of Milwaukee cited DOJ Chief Lynch as re-implementing Jim Crow era policies, and a recent headline on Drudge was “Christian Conservatives Under Siege”